Karl Oscar Weber March 11, 2020

Type Scales

Hi Friends! I'm back! Typography is 95% of web design. The impact and implications of a good type system, the right fonts, and the right colors cannot be overstated. I've never really been all that good at it, but this time I really wanted to do my best and make something that would stand out. Firstly I should share the design that I made for kow.fm v15.

The homepage design doubles as an about page and an index. I realized the primary goal of kow.fm had changed to share educational content, tutorials, books, guides, tips, that sort of thing. It's more than just a journal, but also the nature of my writing has begun to shift too. So this is what I've got. I really like the colors and the simplicity of the typeface.

The post page design with a header image for kow.fm.

This is a post template page with a header image. A big barrier in the past for my writing, was that I had aspirations to include some homemade art with every post. But I never had time to do the Art, or it was just really junky, so the post never made it out. I wanted a design that could work equally well with or without a main post image. So that's what this is.

Post page template with no image for kow.fm.

I also mocked it up without an image and the above image is that. I like it. You can even peek the little aside box that I designed. Kow.fm will also host a course and a book, so the design for those pages needs to just be different. It can't follow the above blog patterns.

The lesson page design for a swift foundations blog lesson.

This is what the lesson pagef looks like, just like the blog design it works equally well with or without a header image. This design is mocked up with a header video. Offering video content. I know that I want to offer premium materials for a subscription to like... pay for things, and stuff. I also want the design to make finding and learning as much about swift as effortless as possible, so I added that endless Menubar on the side.

I haven't mocked up any upgrade or subscription screens yet though. I figured I could start with the free content first and then build the premium gate stuff when I have something to sell.

Dynamic type scales

Yeah so this website has a new dynamic type scale system. It's a really great concept that a couple of fellows at have been working on over at Clearleft; James Gilyead and Trys Mudford. They published this site about their idea and I freaking love it. https://utopia.fyi.

Before this I was highly skeptical of type scales in general. Designers generally just make that shit up anyway, have wild sizes for random ass pieces of a design. Titles are tiny, but only a little tiny, headings are almost the same size, except for h1s, which are huge for some reason. Not even to mention that margins, paddings, and line-heights are all different and special, for whatever reason. So yeah, I'm a bit jaded. The whole design system movement has made in depth, systemized designs much more common and easier to work with, but there is still a lot of confusing bloat to deal with when fitting fonts to different screens. This Utopia thing makes a lot of sense. Dynamically change the type size based on the screen width without media query janky breakpoints.

What is a type scale? It's a relationship between type sizes. When things change in size in a predictable manner, it looks predictable and pleasing to the eye. So a type scale will have those steps change by the same ratio at each step. Let's say your type scale is 1.25 and your initial type size is 16px, each step will be 25% larger or smaller then it's adjacent step. Example:

An example of a 1.25 typescale with type at different sizes.

I used to think this was a bit silly, but now I'm like... DAMN! That looks nice.

Now type scales should be tailored to their context. The mobile web will have a more reserved typescale versus the desktop web. On Desktop you've got a lot of real estate to work with. Big expansive screens, We want to take advantage of that. So the type scale should be bigger on that larger screen. This is what the large typescale looks like next to the smaller one.

Comparison of two different type scales.

As you can see, if you can see, we have two, proportional type scales side by side. They look pretty nice. I like them. You may notice that they don't use perfect pixel sizes, that's fine. Nothing is pixel perfect. Who cares. For kow.fm v15 I wanted to take the concept of a dynamic typescale and expand it to also use dynamic sizes for margins and padding. So I did. The Margins and padding are all dynamic based on screen width.

The type scale is dynamic. That means that the CSS is interpolating between two different sizes based on screen size. You can use a handy tool to calculate your own type scale. It works super well, only uses CSS Variables, and is super well supported.

Using the type scale in CSS is super easy. This is what the styles look like for the h2 and p tags in content areas:

.content {

  & > h2 {
    font-family: 'GreycliffCF', Arial;
    font-weight: 700;
    font-size: var(--step-2);
    line-height: 1.25em;
    margin-bottom: 0.5em;
    margin-top: 2em;
  }
  
  & > p {
    font-family: 'GreycliffCF', Arial;
    font-weight: 500;
    font-size: var(--step-0);
    line-height: 1.5em;
    margin-bottom: 1.5em;
  }
  
}

I've also added some nice typefaces and a simple layout so that text and content isn't as wide as can be.

I'm very satisfied with using the dynamic type scaling for kow.fm. So satisfied that I'm porting the whole thing to another project and doing even more crazy ambitious cool stuff.

What's next?

I'll be refining the typography, and some more type details and colors on the site next. Later I'll tacker header and footer stuff.

Karl Oscar Weber September 05, 2023

I started writing a programming language

Hi friends,

I started writing a programming language in Lua. Lua is fast, small, embeddable, extendable, and has a Garbage Collector. I want to write something that is simple to parse, extensible, and purpose built for writing and working with UI on the web.

Originally I wanted to dig deep into coffeescript to figure this out, I still might do that, but CoffeeScript has a syntax that irks me. I wondered if it would be easy enough to write an interpreter that compiles to another language. Like CoffeeScript to Javascript. I figured that it's gotta be possible, Right? I mean, people have DONE this before. But the issues I have is that CoffeeScript IS Javascript with a mask on and some bits hidden/removed. I want to make something that kinda starts from scratch, Fresh and new with some lessons.

WASM is a thing. So why not write a language that's embedded in your browser? That could be cool right? I'd love to just ship my programming languages files like javascript files, or write it directly on my website, and see it just work. Try to bring some of that magic back. With a stable WASM interpreter I could push that to a CDN and then folks hitting the pages with this language would only need to download the interpreter once.

What's next?

Well, I guess I need to get the basics of the thing working. An interpreter, some Variables, math, and a REPL. Follow along here: https://github.com/karloscarweber/stim

Karl Oscar Weber March 07, 2023

So you want Ruby to grow?

So you like Ruby, and the Ruby community, and you want it to grow? What should you do?

1. Write stuff for beginners.

Always, and first, and primarily, and when you think you've done enough, write more for beginners. I cannot tell you how important it is to write for beginners. The stagnation of new Ruby developers, junior developers, can be attributed to a lot of factors, but the primary factor is that the moment a beginner makes it out of the getting-started page, everything else is for Computer Science Majors/Ruby lovers/Expert Developers. Basic concepts are ASSUMED, which I guess makes sense, but also mildly complex concepts are also ASSUMED. All of this assumption means that practically any tool that Rubyists write for one another is not user friendly.

"But I understand this KOW! This stuff is easy for me."

Right Right Right, but you're not a beginner. If you've been in the Ruby game for about 2 years things start to make a lot more sense. But if you haven't been doing it for that long it's just still a little magical and hand wavey. A lot of Ruby's utility comes from it's metaprogramming abilities, but those take some time to truly grasp.

So please, write stuff for beginners, write more than just "Documentation". Write Getting-started guides, How-to guides, Common use cases documentation, plus examples in standard ruby and with at least 2 frameworks. Bonus points if neither are Rails.

Also please review some basic Ruby stuff when talking about your framework. Dig in a little. Don't assume that we know how this works. We don't. Make it easy to be successful with your code.

2. Focus on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.

I know that some folx don't think it's important. Those folx are wrong. and Stupid. Expanding Ruby means finding people that are overlooked, under-appreciated, and then supporting them. I don't know if ya'll have noticed but almost all tech people are hella white. Just whitey tighties all up in here. Me too. Male, White, Heterosexual, Cis-Gendered, Heck I'm even Christian. I know across the pond and out East it looks a lot different.

Growing Ruby requires building strong community outreach, training, retention, and promotion of folx that don't look like, think like, or talk like the majority of Ruby developers today. I'm serious. If you look around at the current "tech" landscape today. What people are using to make their websites and apps. You won't notice that folx are making these decions based purely on the merits of a technology. It's based on Culture and perception. A whiteness centered culture has driven folx to widely adopt some bad tech. This is a direct result of prioritizing the needs of young, childless, single, white men. People who can work for hours or days on a problem because they hav nothing else to do.

Getting more folx to use Ruby, means going against the grain of tech culture itself.

Give these folx raises, a seat at the table, Hell a piece of the table. Bringing people in to Ruby that aren't already there means accomodating them. Increasing the realm of what's possible. What does that mean? fewer hours? more flexible work schedules? More mentorship? It means doing whatever it takes to bring these folks into the community. Including financial help. Drop a couple of Ks a year, at least, to sponsor, promote, or support under-represented folks coming into the Ruby community.

Forge strong connections with beginners, help them to build their professional networks. We're not getting hired based on our resumes, that almost never really happens. And if that's not the case then we ought to be helping, maybe even focusing on building these relationships with newcomers.

Also NEVER dictate what a donation or support should be used for. People know what to use their money on. Once you give them money, it's theirs.

There is this really silly... assumption? phrase? The best person for the job. The best person for the job doesn't exist, also who cares. We need to find people who are motivated, and kind. Folx that want to grow and improve. The junior developers of today, are the staff engineers of tomorrow. A beginners perspective sheds light on the spaces infrequently seen by an expert. The entrance.

Don't take my word for it. Read Kim Crayton.

3. Promote Framework diversity.

I am biased because I've been performing Necromancy on Camping for over a year. But sincerely, do your best, BEST, to promote framework diversity. A mono culture breeds in weakness. Everyone using Rails when they use Ruby means that only a certain narrow band of problems are easily addressed. It means that different perspectives or priorities are ignored.

Like Motoko Kutsanagi says: "If we all reacted the same way, we'd be predictable, and there's always more than one way to view a situation...It's simple: overspecialize, and you breed in weakness. It's slow death."

So too goes the Ruby way. Overspecialized in a single monolithic framework, All Roads, well rails, lead to… well rails.

Some Great alternative frameworks and tools:

Hanami
Sinatra
Bridgetown
Roda
Camping (Maybe it'll be ready by the summer)

The monoculture is really bad, but there are great signs of this changing. The rise of Hanami and Roda as framework alternatives. The steady march of progress with RACK and it's associated projects. Sinatra just got a brand new release. Phlex, a new templating and component library, seemingly brought to life from nothing in about six months by Joel Drapper, and it's fast as hell. The joy around writing with ruby hasn't abated, and genuinely feels like it's accelerating.

4. Teach more than just Ruby!

This is a big one! Most of what we're doing is making websites. There is no ruby on a webpage. I bet you didn't know that it was just a bunch of HTML,CSS, and Javascript. But it is. Like for reals.

Recently I had the necessity to make a mostly static website, I tried out Bridgetown for the first time, and it was great. Almost no hickups, and I used just regular old HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Almost no JavaScript also. Kids these days think that you need complicated build processes to get a site online. Every "Hello World" or "Crud App" looks so bad because they are devoid of styles. Exceptions to this are few.

If you want to get folks to adopt Ruby, make it easy for them to understand the problem they have, and to find the solutions to the problem they have. Teach the whole enchilada. Top to bottom. Give examples and use cases. I know ya'll know how to do this stuff.

Teach around the problem. Keep folx in your documentation and solve as much of the problem as you can. Hell it will be reference for yourself in a few weeks when you forget something basic anyways.

5. Excise harmful folx

Kick em out. Are they being Racist DumbHasHasses? Show them the door. Are they taking credit for other folx work? Get outta here. Genius is a myth, aint nobody got it.

Harmful, bigotted, and prejudiced folx drive away the exact people you want to bring into the community. They gatekeep and centralize power and influence. Centralized systems have a single point of failure. When it comes to people, it makes a community brittle, poised to either break and fracture, or pull the whole lot down a darker path. Harmful folx narrow perspective, and thus, awareness of what's possible or important.

This may not be a completely bad thing though. The majority of the reason I'm working on Camping, and focusing on this community, is sheer rage at the idiocy of some folks here. A combination of Rage and Sunk Cost Fallacy.

My dad always said that sometimes anger can be a great motivator. Something won't get fixed until you get angry enough to go fix it yourself. That's why I'm here folks. I'm hella Angry.

Karl Oscar Weber February 21, 2023

Isolated

I feel socially isolated by the structure of the place I live in. I like Art, Design, and Culture. Outside of the black mirrors I have, I don't see it, hear it, or experience it.

The physical structure of Western America is shit. Everything requires a car. A car to here, a car to there. The cars are expensive, and dirty, and fucking suck. We live in houses, single family homes. With a nice big buffer between each house. I never see my neighbors except when i glimpse them moving to or from their cars and their homes.

Society is designed to keep us poor, tired, stupid, isolated. To wring out the creativity from our souls, to leave us empty and dross. It is designed to be this way.

We can design something better, but it will take intention. We can improve our lives, and the lives of our neighbhors, but it will require a fuck ton of work. I wnat to do that work but I'm not sure how to start. Maybe I'll write my name on every wall I find. See if that helps.